Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Euler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 19, 1975No. 1001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This cause is before the Court on two motions: Appellants’ Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Record on the grounds that the court reporter, due to her workload, has been unable to prepare the statement of facts; and Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Properly File Appeal Bond.

From the facts contained in both motions it appears that the trial court announced its judgment in this cause from the bench on or about January 20, 1975. After that day, appellee states, she submitted to the appellants on two different occasions, copies of a proposed final judgment, to all of…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glidden Company v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Flowers v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Walker v. S & T Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Cattle Land Oil Co. v. Willis Drilling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell Helicopter Co. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Gruber v. Texas State Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Juarez v. MarchanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Manrique v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API