Legal Opinion

BLEIWEISS v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 24, 2009No. 4D09-4873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1216STEVENSON, J.

Jonathan Bleiweiss, a Broward sheriffs deputy accused of homosexually abusing illegal immigrants, is being held without bond on three sexual battery counts following an Arthur hearing.1 In this petition for writ of habeas corpus, Bleiweiss has argued that relief should be granted because: (1) the finding of proof evident, presumption great, was based solely on hearsay; (2) the court made the finding without first hearing argument from counsel (denying due process); (3) the evidence did not establish proof evident, presumption great; and (4) the trial court refused to set bond…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. ArthurSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Funmaker v. KlammWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Massey v. Charlotte CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preston v. GeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. BLEIWEISS v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  3. Eric Selman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API