Eric Selman v. State

Eric Selman appeals an order finding that he violated his probation by committing trespass after warning, sentencing him to time served, and reinstating the original terms and conditions of his probation. He argues the trial court denied his due process rights by refusing to allow defense counsel to present a closing argument at the final hearing on his violation of probation. We agree and reverse.

After the defense rested — but before being afforded an opportunity to offer a closing argument — the trial court began to announce its ruling. Defense counsel attempted to interject, stating, “Your…