Legal Opinion

InMed Diagnostic Services, L.L.C. v. MedQuest Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 22, 2004No. 3765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOOLSBY, J.:

This appeal arises out of a dispute among competing providers of magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”) services. Med-Quest Associates, Inc., Palmetto Imaging, Inc., and Open MRI of Florence, Inc. (collectively “MedQuest”) appeal a jury verdict in favor of InMed Diagnostic Services, L.L.C. (“InMed”) under the Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”). InMed cross-appeals, arguing error in the award of attorney fees and the trial court’s refusal to award treble damages. We reverse the jury verdict.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The State Certification of Need and Health Facility Licensure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ward v. Dick Dyer and Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. RhoadesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Skinner v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Truong v. Allstate Insurance Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. CITY OF CHARLESTON, SC v. Hotels. Com, LPDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
  5. Inmed Diagnostic v. Medquest Assoc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API