Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Goldman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 26, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
A decree for the judicial settlement of the accounts of the executors has been submitted. The widow objects thereto on the ground that no provision is therein made for the payment to her of the sum of $300 as specified in subdivision 4 of section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act.
The reply of the executors is twofold, first, that by reason of her failure to make prior claim for this sum, she “ is now estopped from raising said objection; ” and second, that since it has been demonstrated in a proceeding relating to the widow’s right to elect against the will under section 18 of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Proving the Will of ShontsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In re Shedd's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- In re WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re the Estate of AyvazianNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of McNamaraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of MurrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of MackenzieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of LeeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
- In re the Estate of VoigtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965