Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Murray
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided June 23, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
By reason of submission on the pleadings there is herein propounded as upon demurrer under the old practice (Matter of Larney, 148 Misc. 871, 872; Matter of Hearn, 158 id. 370, 372), a question as to the legal validity of the answer which has been interposed to this petition to compel an administratrix to file and proceed to settle her account. For present purposes, therefore, the allegations of fact of the answer are to be accepted as true. (Matter of Keeling, 148 Misc. 798; Matter of Hearn, supra; Matter of Chinsky, N. Y. L. J. June 3, 1936, p. 2838.)
Thus viewed, the pertinent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Yates County National Bank v. CarpenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Werra v. CassedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Benedict v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Department of Public Welfare v. National Bank of CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- In re the Estate of DistefanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re HouchinsDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1937
- Ex parte Ferrero AcostaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
- Ex parte Ferrero AcostaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.