Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Stinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 27, 1922No. 4 Div. 951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellee Stinson filed the original bill in this cause praying that a sale of 480 acres of land be decreed in lieu of partition, and that appellant Henderson be brought to account for rents, profits, and waste. Defendant answered denying complainant’s interest in the land and claiming ownership of the entire fee in himself. Further answering, defendant pleaded the statute of limitation of 10 years, the statute (sic) of 20 years, and laches. By amendments, Sarah Stinson, wife of original complainant, and others, were brought in on an averment that they had interests in the land, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. McQueen v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Wheat v. WheatSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Wilkinson v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. McCaw v. BarkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Fundaburk v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Faust v. FaustSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Rehfuss v. McAndrewSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Self v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API