Phebus v. UPMC Horizon
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County
1Opinion of the Court
DOBSON, J,
The matters currently before the court for disposition are the summary judgment motions of defendants Graham and Sakkal. For the reasons that follow, the motion of defendant Graham will be denied and the motion of defendant Sakkal will be granted.
Pa.R.C.P. 1035.2 provides that any party may move for summary judgment in whole or in part as a matter of law:
“(1) whenever there is no genuine issue of any material fact as to a necessary element of the cause of action or defense which could be established by additional discovery or expert report, or
“(2) if, after the completion of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Devine v. HuttSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Moses v. T.N.T. Red Star ExpressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.