Schillinger v. McGarry
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of Manhattan, seventh district, entered in defendant’s favor upon a verdict, directed by the court. The pleadings were oral. The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
This action was brought to recover damages claimed to have been sustained in consequence of the defendant’s refusal to allow the plaintiff’s assignors to complete and carry out their part of an agreement in writing, bearing date the 1st day of October, 1897, made under their firm name of George Schillinger & Company, of which firm the plaintiff was a member, on the one part, and the defendant, on the other, by the terms of which they agreed to “ well and sufficiently finish all the cement and concrete work, viz.: and furnish all the cement and necessary ma*746terial. Cellars, vaults, areas and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bagley v. . BoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Felbel v. KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Luhrs v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Esmond v. SeeleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chambers v. GoldklangAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
- Rosenkranz v. SaberskiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903