McDonald v. Skeen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
Defendant, Ervin Dwain Skeen t/a Dwain Skeen Commercial Industrial Real Estate, appeals an order denying his motion for sum mary judgment in this breach of contract case. He based that motion solely on collateral estoppel grounds. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm.
The pertinent facts are as follows: Plaintiff, C. Wayne McDonald, was a party in an action previously before this Court where Skeen allegedly acted as an agent during the events leading to that lawsuit. See Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonald, 149 N.C. App. 817, 561 S.E.2d 578 (2002). We held a partnership…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Cap Care Group, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bluebird Corp. v. AubinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Williams v. City of Jacksonville Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- James River Equipment, Inc. v. Mecklenburg Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Youse v. Duke Energy Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Baum v. John R. Poore Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.