Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Goldman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 20, 2009No. Nos. 07-55501, 08-60005Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Peter T. McCarthy appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order rejecting his claimed exemptions in patents and other property and its pre-filing order prohibiting further amendments of his claimed exemptions without prior court approval, as well as the BAP’s denial of his motion to stay the bankruptcy court’s decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.
None of the sections McCarthy cites support his claim that the patents are exempt. California Code of Civil Procedure 704.210 does not apply…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- De Long v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,650 in Re Karen Virginia Stanton, Debtor. T.O. King v. Karen Virginia StantonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Teleport Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Zanetti v. ZanettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947