Legal Opinion
Kyle v. Continental Capital Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1983No. 83-2772PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, Chief Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff A.B. Kyle seeks compensatory and punitive damages as well as an order for future compliance with respect to a contract allegedly entered into between Kyle and defendant Continental Capital Corporation (Continental). Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania citizen, alleges that the Panama-based defendant breached its obligation to pay plaintiff a portion of brokerage fees obtained as a result of the placement of certain loans. Continental has moved to dismiss the claims against it on the grounds that this court lacks personal jurisdiction, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newport Components, Inc. v. NEC Home Electronics (U.S.A.), Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Raymark Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Harte-Hanks Direct Marketing/Baltimore, Inc. v. Varilease Technology Finance Group, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- National Precast Crypt Co. v. Dy-Core of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Electro-Catheter Corp. v. Surgical Specialties Instrument Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.