Mishawaka Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. Powell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Ho». George F. Longan, Judge. (1) The property in question, having been reduced to the actual possession of the Federal court and there held by its order, at first by its receiver, and then by its trustee, which court was proceeding to sell the same as part of the bankrupt’s estate to pay claims allowed against said estate in that court, was in custodia legis, and being so held was not subject to the process of any other court not having…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Pettis Circuit Court. — Ho». George F. Longan, Judge. (1) The property in question, having been reduced to the actual possession of the Federal court and there held by its order, at first by its receiver, and then by its trustee, which court was proceeding to sell the same as part of the bankrupt’s estate to pay claims allowed against said estate in that court, was in custodia legis, and being so held was not subject to the process of any other court not having supervisory or appellate jurisdiction over said bankrupt court. State ex rel. v. Netherton, 26 Mo. App. 414; Bentley v.…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, P. J.
This is an action of replevin to recover certain personal property consisting of men’s .knit, felt and rubber boots. The plaintiff is a manufacturing company incorporated under the laws of the -State of Indiana.
The cause was submitted to the circuit court upon .an agreed statement of facts which was to the effect: (1) That Huyssen & Holm were partners engaged in the boot and shoe business in this State; that they procured the goods described in the plaintiff’s petition on a written order in which, amongst other things, it was recited that, “the title and property in all the goods herein…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Buck v. ColbathSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Sullivan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- D. C. Wise Coal Co. v. Columbia Lead & Zinc Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- Darrough v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Darrough v. First Nat. Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Giffin v. PetreeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.