Legal Opinion

Halfin v. Winkleman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1892No. 6752PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Judge,

Section B.—This is a suit by John G. and Ida Winkleman against Aug. Voigt, on a promissory note executed by Voigt to John Winkleman for the sum of $400. The note bears date March 29, 1883, and is due and payable January 1, 1885. The note was given as a part of the purchase money of 129 acres of land, that is described in certain deeds referred to in the note. The note retains a vendor’s lien on the land. The petition asks for judgment against Voigt on the note, and that the vendor’s lien be foreclosed on the land. The appellant Halfin is made a party defendant, for the reason,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. A. May & Co. v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Lasater v. Van HookTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clay-Butler Lumber Co. v. W. H. Pickering Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Engelbach v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Bank of Woodson v. HibbittsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. White v. ManningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Finklea v. First State Bank of JoaquinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API