Legal Opinion
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Rae
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided November 24, 1952PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchweitzer, J.
The within action is brought by the plaintiff to recover the sum of $1,786.80 which the plaintiff, a common carrier licensed and engaged in interstate commerce, claims represents certain delivery and storage charges. The action was submitted to this court on an agreed statement of facts, the essential elements of which are as follows:
Prior to June 24, 1949, the defendants resided in Beaverton, Oregon. The defendant at that time was employed by Earl Witt, Inc.; that in March, 1949, the defendant, John Rae, was advised of an impending proposed transfer to the New York City area, and in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- New York Central Railroad v. Federal Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Norton v. ShotmeyerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
- Erie Railroad v. H. Rosenstein, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. L. N. White & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. HarbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Lyon Van Lines, Inc. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- National Van Lines, Inc. v. HerbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Tom Hicks Transfer Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Texas Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. HankeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.