Legal Opinion
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Harbin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 13, 1972No. 46932PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.
Mr. and Mrs. David Harbin were living in Connecticut, where he was employed by IBM. Mr. Harbin was offered employment in Dallas, Texas by CCC Computer Corp., which he accepted, a consideration of employment being that CCC would arrange and pay for the moving of his household goods and furniture and a Mustang automobile from Connecticut to Texas. An official of CCC called Mayflower’s representative in Dallas and arranged a conference (between himself, Harbin and the Mayflower representative) at which the arrangements were made, and CCC gave written authorization to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Griffin Grocery Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. RaeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Checker Van Lines v. Siltek International, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. EddyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Martin v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- O'BOyle Tank Lines, Inc., F/d/b/a M & M Tank Lines, Inc. v. Milton Beckham, D/B/A Milton Beckham CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.