Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 2004No. ED 83794PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The State of Missouri (“State”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining Thomas Graham’s (“Graham”) motion to dismiss the indictment against him for sodomy under section 563.230 RSMo 1969 based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. 1 State contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the indictment because there is no statute of limitations for the 1969 sodomy statute. We reverse and remand.

On December 17, 2002, the grand jury indicted Graham on the felony charge of sodomy, in violation of section 563.230, for an act or acts that allegedly occurred on or between…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hadlock v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. State v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State v. DanielMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BarrazaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State of Missouri v. Nicholas A. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State of Missouri v. Maurice Parnell WebberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. AcevedoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API