Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Lowrance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 11, 2000No. 2D99-2278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUE, Judge.

Linda Riggs, the mother, sought an increase in the child support obligation of Charles Lowrance, the father. In this appeal from the order denying modification, she argues, and we agree, that the trial court abused its discretion. We reverse.

The parties initially set the amount of child support by settlement *1103agreement, which was incorporated into the final judgment of dissolution in 1997. Even when child support has been fixed in this way, however, the amount may be increased based on a substantial change of circumstances. See State, Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Svcs. ex rel.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. Desilets v. DesiletsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Forte v. ForteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. KnappDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Paulette v. RosellaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Paulette v. RosellaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API