Paulette v. Rosella
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
*572The parties' original child support obligations were set forth in a mediated settlement agreement ("MSA") which was incorporated into a final order. The MSA called for Appellant ("Father") to support the children, who would stay with him for 300 nights per year, while Appellee ("Mother") was not required to pay child support "at this time" because she was not employed "at this time." The MSA required Mother to advise Father within ten days of her obtaining full-time employment. Father subsequently moved to modify Mother's support obligations after she became employed on a full-time basis. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. SchouSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Riggs v. LowranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Knapp v. KnappDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001