Legal Opinion

Boley v. UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02644Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARY K. BOLEY, et al. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 20-2644 : UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, : INC., et al. : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. March 8, 2021 Three participants in their former employer’s defined contribution plan are suing the plan’s fiduciaries for allegedly breaching fiduciary duties owed to them under ERISA. The three plan participants move to certify and represent a class of over 60,000 active participants. The plan participants invested in different funds but focus their allegations on the fiduciaries allegedly…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Thole v. U. S. Bank N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2020
  5. In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API