Legal Opinion

Van Doren v. Dickerson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill to foreclose. On final hearing. On pleading and stipulation as to facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The CHANCELLOR.

The mortgage which the bill in this suit was filed to foreclose, was made to secure’ the payment of a bond given in 1864 by John ~W. Lee to Peter T. B. Van Doren, in the penalty of $500, with the following condition:

“ Whereas, the said Peter T. B. Van Doren, by a deed dated March 31st, 1864, duly executed by himself and wife, and delivered this day, hath conveyed unto said John W. Lee, two certain tracts of land situate in the village of Denville, in said county of Morris, which lands were formerly owned by Francis Lindsly, and are particularly described in said deed, to which,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eagle Fire Co. v. LentNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Campbell v. MacombNew York Court of Chancery · 1820

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Pennsylvania Co. v. Broadway-Stevens Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Sorg v. TowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API