Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided February 28, 1989No. Docket Nos. 5694-84; 32283-87UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions

Petitioners executed consent Forms 872 extending the statute of limitations on assessment and returned them to respondent with a cover letter stating they were conditioned upon respondent transferring the related audits from Connecticut to California. Respondent's delegated agent executed the consents and either did not see or ignored the cover letter. Respondent's efforts to transfer the audit to California were unsuccessful.

Read the full summary

Petitioners executed consent Forms 872 extending the statute of limitations on assessment and returned them to respondent with a cover letter stating they were conditioned upon respondent transferring the related audits from Connecticut to California. Respondent's delegated agent executed the consents and either did not see or ignored the cover letter. Respondent's efforts to transfer the audit to California were unsuccessful. Held: the consent Forms 872 were invalid, the cover-letter condition to which they were subject not having been met. Further held, petitioners are not equitably…

1Opinion of the Court

RALPH AND JEANNE K. SMITH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Smith v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 5694-84; 32283-87.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1989-87; 1989 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 76; 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 1373; T.C.M. (RIA) 89087;

February 28, 1989.

Petitioners executed consent Forms 872 extending the statute of limitations on assessment and returned them to respondent with a cover letter stating they were conditioned upon respondent transferring the related audits from Connecticut to California. Respondent's delegated agent executed the consents and either did not see or…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Hicks Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schulman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  2. United States v. HodgekinsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
  3. Eaton Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
  4. Becker Holding Corp. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004
  5. Estate of Taft v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API