Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 8, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00201Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SARAH ANDERSEN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-00201-WHO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 v. STRIKE AND REQUESTS FOR FEES 10 STABILITY AI LTD., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 50, 136 Defendants. 11 12 DeviantArt has renewed its special motion to strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. 13 Cal. Code of Civ. Proc. § 425.16. As explained below, DeviantArt’s motion to strike is DENIED 14 because the Complaint and Amended Complaint fall within the anti-SLAPP statute’s public 15 interest exception. 16 BACKGROUND 17 In my prior…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Filmon.Com. Inc. v. Doubleverify Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Patrick Maloney v. T3media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Price v. StosselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.