Legal Opinion

Mariani & Richards v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Mariani and Richards (Employer) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a referee’s denial of Employer’s petition for modification for Richard Kowalecki (Claimant). We vacate and remand for reasons as hereinafter discussed.

Claimant, a construction worker, was injured on September 25, 1984, and subsequently received benefits under a notice for compensation payable. Thereafter, on June 24, 1987, Employer filed a Modification Petition alleging Claimant’s full recovery from his work-related injury.

The referee granted Employer a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Farkaly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Hawkins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Keys-Pealers, Ltd./Pealer's Flowers v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API