Legal Opinion

Mktg Des. Source, Inc. v. Pranda N.A., Inc., 93-699 (2000)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 2, 2000No. C.A. No. 93-699Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before the Court is defendant's motion for new trial, pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rhode Island Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendant's motion follows a jury verdict entered for the plaintiff.

Facts/Travel

On May 18, 1992, Marketing Design Source, Inc. (MDS or plaintiff) and Pranda North America, Inc. (Pranda or defendant), by their respective agents Margaret Cook (Cook) and Karen Bannister Pajaka (Bannister), executed an agency agreement dated April 30, 1992 (the agreement).

Pursuant to the agreement, MDS acted as "advertising agency and marketing counsel" for Pranda on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barbato v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  2. DeChristofaro v. MacHalaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. Long v. Atlantic PBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  4. DiLuglio v. Providence Auto Body, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Reccko v. Criss Cadillac Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API