Legal Opinion

Krassnoski v. Rosey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1996No. 00598PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue is whether in an action under the Protection from Abuse Act an unsuccessful defendant may be ordered to pay counsel fees to a legal services organization which represented plaintiff without charge. We hold that the Protection from Abuse Act authorizes the trial court to assess reasonable counsel fees on the defendant even in cases where plaintiff has been represented free of charge.

The request for counsel fees in this case was made by plaintiff Krassnoski through her counsel, Southern Alleghenys Legal Aid, Inc. in connection with her petition under the Protection from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Shands v. CastrovinciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Krebs v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Boehm, R. v. Riversource Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Ambrose v. Citizens National Bank of Evans CitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Johnson v. CoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API