Carnicle v. Swann
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Chief Justice.
Appellee sued appellant for the reasonable value of materials and labor expended to remodel appellant’s house. The trial court’s judgment dismissed appellant’s *312counterclaim, rescinded the contract and allowed appellee the reasonable value of work performed. Appellant appeals from this judgment. We affirm.
In late 1977 appellant was the successful bidder on a structure that was originally constructed as a place to sell produce and was later remodeled into a dwelling. Appellant had the structure moved onto its present location, a residential lot on West Lotta Street in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Beatty v. DepueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
- Nilsson v. KruegerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
- Stark v. StarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- McDonald v. Miners & Merchants Bank, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carnicle v. SwannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Metabank v. Interstate Commodities, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2017