Legal Opinion

Meharg v. Alabama Power Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1918No. 7 Div. 930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Talladega. County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge. Action by B. F. Meharg against the Alabama Power Company. From the judgment, rendered, plaintiff appeals, and the cause was-' submitted under rule 46 (175 Ala. xxi, 65-South. vii).

1Opinion of the Court

This case was submitted and considered -under rule 46 (65 South, vii 1 ), and the opinion of the court was delivered By

Mr. Chief Justice ANDERSON:

The counts of the complaint practically embodied the material parts of plea 8 in the case of Burnett v. Ala. Power Co., 74 South. 459, 2 and thus, in effect, negatived any right to recover as for a public nuisance in the construction and maintenance of the dam. While some of the counts charged a negligent failure to clear the ground of timber, etc., before the construction of the said dam, they charge that the proximate cause of the injury was from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Hamilton v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Kirkland v. PilcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jones v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Ellis v. Black Diamond Coal Mining CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. City of Bessemer v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Wheeler v. River Falls Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Battles v. Pierson Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API