Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. River Falls Power Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 18, 1926No. 4 Div. 243PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The purpose of the first four counts of appellant’s complaint was to state a cause of action as for a nuisance for that appellee,, defendant, erected a dam across Conecuh river, thereby impounding the waters of the river, and causing plaintiff to become sick, and to suffer physical pain and mental anguish. There is in these counts no allegation that the dam was unlawfully or wrongfully erected, and for that reason, according to cases of recent decision in this court, the demurrer to these counts was properly sustained. Hamilton v. Alabama Power Co., 195 Ala. 438, 70 So. 737; Burnett v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Parke v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Hamilton v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Town of Vernon v. WedgeworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. Burnett v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API