Legal Opinion

People v. Poveromo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided August 15, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorándum. In this action, defendant was charged with permitting fresh fill to be dumped onto property below the mean high watermark of the Nissequogue River without obtaining the' permit required by chapter 25B-3 of the Code of the Town of Smithtown. After trial, the trial count (see 71 Misc 2d 524) held that ;

1. Title to the land in question was held by the State in trust for the People’s use.

2. The State has evinced a clear and unambiguous intent to exercise complete control over these lands (Conservation Law, § 400-a et seq. [now ECL, art. 15, '§ 15-0101 et seq.]).

3. The town, a creature…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. PoveromoSuffolk County District Court · 1972
  2. People v. Gibson & CushmanSuffolk County District Court · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evans v. City of JohnstownNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Town of Islip v. PowellNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rottenberg v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. New York City Housing Authority v. Commissioner of the Environmental Conservation DepartmentNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  5. People v. AntonSuffolk County District Court · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API