New York City Housing Authority v. Commissioner of the Environmental Conservation Department
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAngelo Graci, J.
The controversy before the court involves article 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, known as the Tidal Wetlands Act (hereinafter the act), enacted "to preserve and protect tidal wetlands, and to prevent their despoliation and destruction, giving due consideration to the reasonable economic and social development of the state”. (ECL 25-0102.) Petitioner, the New York City Housing Authority (hereinafter authority) contends that the. act is inapplicable to property acquired by the authority through eminent domain and that, in any event, the authority has been deprived of property without…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Prashker v. United States Guarantee Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Kovarsky v. Housing & Development AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Orleans Builders & Developers v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Russo v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- de St. Aubin v. BigganeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Asian American for Equality v. KochNew York Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.