King v. Federal Underwriters Exchange

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The judgment of the trial court, in favor of the employee, was reversed by the Court .of Civil Appeals because of alleged improper argument of counsel for the employee.

The arguments complained of and the rulings of the trial court thereon are as follows:(1) “Mr. Fulmer (Counsel for employee) : You see the significance of this where you were called on if you would give the same credit to a doctor you didn’t know as you would to a local doctor. If you suggested you would pay more attention to Dr. Travis than you would to any other, you would have been…