Legal Opinion

Lisenby v. Lisenby

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Multnomah: George W. Stapleton, Judge. Department 1. The plaintiff sued for and was granted a decree of divorce. The defendant was given the custody of the two children, one of whom is now about á years of age and the other is now about 2 years of age. The father was directed to pay $30 per month to the mother for the maintenance of the children.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: George W. Stapleton, Judge. Department 1. The plaintiff sued for and was granted a decree of divorce. The defendant was given the custody of the two children, one of whom is now about á years of age and the other is now about 2 years of age. The father was directed to pay $30 per month to the mother for the maintenance of the children. The defendant did not ask for any affirmative relief but her answer contained only a general denial and a prayer for the dismissal of the suit. The plaintiff was satisfied with the decree but the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, J. —

No useful purpose could possibly be accomplished by a detailed recital of the unhappy conditions which brought about the separation of the plaintiff and defendant. An examination of the record cannot but impress the reader that the plaintiff is a patient husband, kind father and a hard-working man; that the defendant is a good mother and a virtuous woman; and that in all likelihood harmony rather than discord would have prevailed had the parties lived alone and in a home of their own instead of attempting to live under the same roof with relatives, well meaning though they were.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steele v. SteeleOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Parman v. ParmanOregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API