Parman v. Parman
Oregon Supreme Court
From Wheeler: Fred W. Wilson, Judge. In Banc. This is a suit for divorce. The district attorney was not served with summons, but personally appeared, and his appearance was noted in the record at the trial. There was a decree dismissing the suit, and plaintiff appeals. The district attorney was not served with notice of the appeal, and defendant moves to dismiss the appeal for that reason.
1Opinion
*309Affirmed December 16, 1919.
On the Merits.
(185 Pac. 922.)
The plaintiff and defendant were married at Con-don, Oregon, on October 3, 1907, and lived together as man and wife until about September, 1917. ■ During that time six children were born to the plaintiff and defendant, four of them still living and two were born dead. During the first years of their married life the plaintiff and defendant seemed to have gotten along moderately well. There was perhaps some bickering and disagreement, but probably not more than often occurs in the marriage relation. During the last year or two, however,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lisenby v. LisenbyOregon Supreme Court · 1918