Legal Opinion

United States v. Mandel

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 25, 1911No. 297PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, G. A. 6733 (T. D: 28815). ,

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The collector of customs at the port of Chicago classified certain dress goods as composed of cotton and silk, with cotton as the component material of chief value, and assessed them for duty at 8 cents per square yard and 30 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 311 of the tariff act of 1897, which reads as follows:

311. Cloth, composed of cotton or other vegetable fiber and silk, whether known as silk-striped sleeve linings, silk stripes, or otherwise, of which cotton is the component material of chief value, eight cents per square yard and thirty per centum ad valorem:…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seeberger v. FarwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Rothschild v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Magone v. LuckemeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Heyliger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. United States v. AuffmordtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Gresham v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API