Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1896No. 873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee, a corporation, against appellant to vacate an award of the amount of loss sustained on a stock of goods covered by the insurance policy described in our conclusions of fact, upon the ground that the appraisers who made the award were incompetent and interested, and, in awarding the damages, were partial to the appellant, and assessed the damage far below that which was actually sustained, and to recover on the policy the actual loss.

The case was tried before a jury who, after finding that the appraisers in making the award did not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Agricultural Insurance of WatertownNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Twine v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. W. T. Waggoner EstateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Home Ins. Co. v. KetcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. v. Waggoner EstateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. West Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Security Ins. Co. v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API