Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Acker

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1998No. 97-408PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Steve and Julie Quigley (the Quigleys) contracted with John and Elizabeth Acker (the Ackers) for the purchase of land owned by the Ackers. The Quigleys defaulted on their payment obligation, and were unable to pay the accelerated balance of the purchase price on time. The Ackers then sought to terminate the contract and impose a forfeiture. The Quigleys brought this action to obtain a declaration that the Ackers’ notices of default and termination were defective; to obtain relief from forfeiture; and to obtain attorney fees and costs of suit. The Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wortman v. GriffMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lauderdale v. GraumanMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Parrott v. HellerMontana Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Gleason v. Central United Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Boyne USA, Inc. v. Lone Moose Meadows, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. R.C. Hobbs Enterprises, LLC v. J.G.L. Distributing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Montana Earth Resources Ltd. Partnership v. North Blaine Estates, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Swinger v. CollinsMontana Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API