Legal Opinion

Wortman v. Griff

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1982No. 82-056PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This action arose out of two agreements by the plaintiffs with Gary Griff and Gerald Caplan, as individuals, and with Conservative Investors Group, a California corporation, for two parcels of land. A trial was held in the District Court of the Eighteenth Judicial District. In its decision, the District Court found that the contracts were separate and distinct agreements, and that plaintiff had defrauded the defendant corporation. From this judgment, plaintiff appeals.

The defendants, Griff and Caplan, who are officers and the sole shareholders of the defendant corporation, contacted the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. In re Muncie Pulp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  3. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Hellickson v. Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Shechter v. BrewerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Moats Trucking Co. v. Gallatin Dairies, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Fleming v. Fleming Farms, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. First Security Bank v. Vander PasMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Monte Vista Co. v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Goodover v. Lindey's, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API