Legal Opinion

Stop & Shop Supermarket Co. v. Loomer

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 28, 2005No. 03-P-1643PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

We consider whether G. L. c. 93A, § 11, applies to *170the following circumstance. While employed as a cash office clerk at The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company (Stop & Shop), Karen Loomer cashed eight checks for her husband, Richard Loomer, in the amount of $5,185. Both knew that the checks were drawn on their joint personal checking account at a time when the account contained insufficient funds, but Richard had immediate need of cash to meet his general contracting company’s payroll.

We conclude that the defendants’ conduct, even if amounting to conversion or deceit, does not amount to a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. PMP Associates, Inc. v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Milliken & Co. v. Duro Textiles, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Santander Consumer USA Inc. v. WalshDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  3. Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Choate v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  5. Hug v. Gargano & Associates, P.C.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API