Puustinen v. Saari
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, O.
Action for damages for breach of contract, in which plaintiff recovered a verdict of $4,073. Defendants have appealed from a denial of their blended motion for judgment or a new trial. There *59is one assignment of error. The question presented is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict.
Plaintiff is a Finnish laborer, unable to speak the English language. Defendants are dealers in forest products and were conducting logging operations near Palo in St. Louis county in the winter of 1920-1921. J. H. Bacon was their camp clerk. As their authorized agent and in their…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Saari v. PuustinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Puustinen v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923