Puustinen v. Saari

Alter defendants’ previous appeal was determined here, 154 Minn. 58, 191 N. W. 273, they moved in the court below for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Their motion was denied and they appealed again.

The newly discovered evidence was set out in two affidavits. One was made by a man named Eappi and was to the effect that in January, 1921,,'he saw plaintiff and his nephew, Tikander,- at work cutting pine logs and asked plaintiff whether he was not “on the wrong man’s land,” and plaintiff flushed and replied: “I have leased this land and bought the timber from the Iron…