Kargman v. Jacobs
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
*697Kelleher, J.
Max R. and William M. Kargman (plaintiffs) are general partners in the Kent Farm Company (Company), a Massachusetts limited partnership, which owns six .parcels of land in the city of East Providence. *698■Such land, together with all buildings and improvements thereon had been assessed, for the purposes of local taxation, on December 31, 19691 in the amount of $188,960. During 1970 and 1971 the Company undertook the construction of a 250 apartment complex which is sometimes referred to in the record as “Kent Farm.” The endeavor was regulated by §221 (d)(3)2 of the National Housing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Springfield Marine Bank v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Allen v. Bonded M'n'c'p'l. Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
- SOCONY-VACUUM OIL COMPANY v. FrenchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Cummings v. ShoreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Ferland Corp. v. BouchardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
- Nasco, Inc. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.