Legal Opinion

Kargman v. Jacobs

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 1, 1974No. 73-223-AppealPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*697Kelleher, J.

Max R. and William M. Kargman (plaintiffs) are general partners in the Kent Farm Company (Company), a Massachusetts limited partnership, which owns six .parcels of land in the city of East Providence. *698■Such land, together with all buildings and improvements thereon had been assessed, for the purposes of local taxation, on December 31, 19691 in the amount of $188,960. During 1970 and 1971 the Company undertook the construction of a 250 apartment complex which is sometimes referred to in the record as “Kent Farm.” The endeavor was regulated by §221 (d)(3)2 of the National Housing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of New Brunswick v. State of New Jersey Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Springfield Marine Bank v. Property Tax Appeal BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Allen v. Bonded M'n'c'p'l. Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
  5. SOCONY-VACUUM OIL COMPANY v. FrenchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Cummings v. ShoreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. Darcel, Inc. v. City of Manitowoc Board of ReviewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Frank v. Assessors of SkowheganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. Ferland Corp. v. BouchardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. Nasco, Inc. v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API