Legal Opinion

HART v. ARCHER

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 10, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00140Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROBERT JAMES HART, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 2:24-cv-00140-JAW ) JUSTICE JENNIFER ARCHER, et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION AFTER REVIEW OF COMPLAINT Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee, alleges that in a state court criminal prosecution, Defendants are violating or have violated certain constitutional protections. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) The defendants consist of a judge, a prosecutor, a court clerk, and a local sheriff. Plaintiff’s complaint is subject to a preliminary review “before docketing, if feasible or . . . as soon as practicable…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API