Legal Opinion

Baltimore & OR Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided December 1, 1934No. 305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SÓPER, Circuit Judge.

This suit in equity was brought under the provisions of the Act of October 22, 1913, c. 32, 38 Stat. 219 (28 USCA § 41 (28) and §§ 43-46), to enjoin, set aside, and annul certain orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, in which the Commission prescribed divisions, as between northern and southern carriers, of the through rates on Florida citrus fruit moving by railroad to destinations in official classification territory. An interlocutory injunction was likewise sought, and a court of three judges was organized to hear and determine the controversy, under the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1935
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Delaware & H. R. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Boston & M. R.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API