Legal Opinion

Nordin v. Retzlaff

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 27, 2010No. A09-1854Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHELLHAS, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent, arguing that his mother’s third-party partial payment on a promissory note did not toll the statute of limitations under Minn.Stat. § 336.3-118(b) (2008). Respondent challenges the district court’s denial of attorney fees and costs.

FACTS

Appellant Roland Retzlaff and respondent Susan Nordin were previously married to one another. During their marriage, respondent’s parents, Lester and Eleanor Nordin, advanced money to the parties. Neither Lester nor Eleanor Nor-din demanded repayment of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Fallon v. FallonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Atwood v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Pfenninger v. KokeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Portner v. WilfahrtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API