Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Fifth Third Bank

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 15, 2015No. 14-2508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Fifth Third Bank held a mortgage on property owned by the Bartletts’ wholly-owned corporation, High-Q Farms, Inc. Although the Bartletts owned no interest in the property, they claimed they did when they personally filed for bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court allowed Fifth Third to collaterally attack the Bartletts’ confirmed bankruptcy plan based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, even though Fifth Third did not appear in the bankruptcy proceeding to object or appeal the confirmation. The district court affirmed. We hold that Fifth Third was not barred from collaterally attacking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Salem, Maurice J. v. Neshewat, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  4. In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence, Debtor. Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re Diana Lynn HARVEY, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ShannonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. In re Mario Lamont SimsDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  3. In re: Harvey Edelstein and Kathleen Mastro-EdelsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API