Legal Opinion

In re: Harvey Edelstein and Kathleen Mastro-Edelstein

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 7, 2022No. 17-11461Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: ) Bankruptcy Case No. 17 B 11461 HARVEY EDELSTEIN Chapter 13 KATHLEEN MASTRO-EDELSTEIN, ) Debtors. Honorable Janet S. Baer MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court for ruling on the Motion to Determine Final Cure and Post- Petition Mortgage Amount filed by Harvey Edelstein and Kathleen Mastro-Edelstein (the “Debtors”). The Debtors seek a determination, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3002.1(h), that: (1) they have cured their pre-petition mortgage arrears, and (2) the amount of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. In the Matter of Phyllis Maxine Pence, Debtor. Appeal of Pacesetter Bank of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Diana Lynn HARVEY, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. In re MorrowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API