Rabinowitz v. Pizer
New York Supreme Court
Action by Julius Rabinowitz and another against Leon Pizer. Heard -on demurrer to the complaint. Sustained. The following is a copy of the complaint:
1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.
In Matter of Abraham v. Goldberg, 6 Misc. Rep. 43, 25 N. Y. Supp. 1113, the attention of the learned court seems not to have been directed to the question of public policy, and the demurrer herein must be sustained, for the reason that the agreement attempted to be made was void under well-settled authority. Knauss v. Krueger Brewing Co., 142 N. Y. 70, 36 N. E. 867; Carman v. Beach, 63 N. Y. 97; Robinson v. Clock, 38 App. Div. 67, 55 N. Y. Supp. 976; Auerbach v. Curie, 119 App. Div. 175, 104 N. Y. Supp. 233.
Demurrer sustained, with costs.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Knauss v. Gottfried Krueger Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Carman v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Auerbach v. CurieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Robinson v. ClockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Abraham v. GoldbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Burton v. PET, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Galitzka v. FieldsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912