Legal Opinion

in Re Commitment of Charles Philip Anderson

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided January 24, 2013No. 09-11-00613-CVPublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.

Charles Philip Anderson challenges his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 841.001-.151 (West 2010 & Supp. 2012) (the SVP statute). A person is a “sexually violent predator” subject to commitment if the person: “(1) is a repeat sexually violent offender; and (2) suffers from a behavioral abnormality that makes the person likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence.” Id. § 841.003(a) (West 2010). Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and he challenges some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. in Re Commitment of Dennis Ray StutevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  2. in Re Commitment of Lester Winkle, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
  3. In re the Commitment of ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. in Re Commitment of Edward Russell Tesson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
  5. In Re Commitment of Guaquien Rozalez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2026

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API