in Re Commitment of Charles Philip Anderson
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID GAULTNEY, Justice.
Charles Philip Anderson challenges his civil commitment as a sexually violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 841.001-.151 (West 2010 & Supp. 2012) (the SVP statute). A person is a “sexually violent predator” subject to commitment if the person: “(1) is a repeat sexually violent offender; and (2) suffers from a behavioral abnormality that makes the person likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence.” Id. § 841.003(a) (West 2010). Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, and he challenges some…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- in Re Commitment of Dennis Ray StutevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- in Re Commitment of Lester Winkle, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
- In re the Commitment of ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- in Re Commitment of Edward Russell Tesson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
- In Re Commitment of Guaquien Rozalez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2026
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.