Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Bennett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2013No. Docket No. 311357PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action seeking payment of attorney fees, defendant, Timothy Bennett, appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to plaintiff, attorney Stephen Dunn, on his claims for breach of contract and account stated. Plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal, challenging the trial court’s entry of summary disposition in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs conversion claim.1 For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.

*769This appeal arises from defendant’s engaging the services of plaintiff to represent him in actions that were brought against defendant by the Internal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Quality Products and Concepts Co. v. Nagel Precision, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Doe v. Henry Ford Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Saad Khadher v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. BloedelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Hagan v. BairdDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API